The question I hear perhaps most often, when a new book comes out, or if I'm presenting at a conference, is "what's new?" or "what's the latest and greatest in Windows version <insert upcoming release version>?"
In January, 2012, after attending a conference, I was at baggage claim at my home airport along with a fellow attendee (to the conference)...he asked me about a Windows NT4 system he was analyzing. In November of 2016, I was involved in an engagement where I was analyzing about half a dozen Windows 2003 server systems. On an online forum just last week, I saw a question regarding tracking users accessing MSOffice 2003 documents on Windows 2003 systems.
The lesson here is, don't throw out or dismiss the "old stuff", because sometimes all you're left with is the old stuff. Knowing the process for analysis is much more important than memorizing tidbits and interesting facts that you may or may not ever actually use.
Douglas Brush recently started recording podcast interviews with industry luminaries, beginning with himself (the array is indexed at zero), and then going to Chris Pogue and David Cowen. I took the opportunity to listen to the interview with Chris not long ago; he and I had worked together for some time at IBM (I was part of the ISS purchase, Chris was brought over from the IBM team).
Something Chris said during the interview was very poignant; it was one of those things that incident responders know to be true, even if it's not something you've ever stated or specifically crystallized in your own thoughts. Chris mentioned during the interview that when faced with a number of apparently complex options, non-technical folks will often tend toward those options with which they are most familiar. This is true not just in information security (Chris mentioned firewalls, IDS, etc.), but also during incident response. As a responder and consultant, I've seen time and again where it takes some time for the IT staff that I'm working with to understand that while, yes, there is malware on this system, it's there because someone specifically put it there so that they could control it (hands on keyboard) and move laterally within the infrastructure.
Chris's interview was fascinating, and I spent some time recently listening to David's interview, as well. I had some great take-aways from a lot of the things David said. For example, a good bit of David's work is clearly related to the courts, and he does a great job of dispelling some of what may be seen as myth, as well as addressing a few simple facts that should (I say "should" because it's not always the case) persist across all DFIR work, whether you're headed to court to testify or not. David also has some great comments on the value of sharing information within the community.
So far, it's been fascinating to listen to the folks being interviewed, but to be honest, there a lot of women who've done exceptional work in the field, as well, and should not be overlooked. Mari DeGrazia, Jamie Levy, Cindy Murphy, Sarah Edwards, to name just a few. These ladies, as well as many others, have had a significant impact on, and continue to contribute to, the community.
I did listen to the Silver Bullet Podcast not long ago, specifically the episode where Lesley Carhart was interviewed. It's good to get a different perspective on the industry, and I'm not just talking about from a female perspective. Lesley comes from a background that is much different from mine, so I found listening to her interview very enlightening.